Excellent post, and your point about Sam's surly demeanour is spot on. However frustrated he might be, getting snarky with interviewers helps nobody.

First season - good progress made both finals, 2nd season CC win, but it was blowing out of the playoffs at home 3 times in a row 2019/20/21 to Castleford, Hull and Hull KR which probably left an air of disappointment. People forget this. 

Expectations were higher then I think. Seems to me a run to the final in the Challenge Cup is good enough for most now. 

Not for me! After 09,10,12 and 19 I have a bit of a "been there, done that" mentality. There's only one trophy that matters anymore. 


Funny, 14 year old me who watched us lose to Bradford at the McAlpine in that Semi in '01 would've killed for 4 Wembley wins! 

That was heartbreaking wasn't it but a few years later, 2004 onwards I guess, we found ourselves with the money, facilities, and recruitment to compete with the top teams which allowed us to raise our expectations (rightly).

Following the false dawn with a protracted Cullen period, we appointed a quality, proven coach in Tony Smith and things started to take shape. The 2009-2013 period i thought we were building into one of the dominant forces of SL, playing sublime rugby, then it sort of all went off the boil as the squad quality slowly dropped and Smith lost his way, grew a beard and started signing project players (Gary Wheeler, Ryan Bailey et al).  We had a bit of a go 2018/19 but again faded.


As of now we still have the money and facilities but not the squad or the culture/desire to win a GF. 

I always expected Price's reputation to get better with the passing of time when people forget what it was like.

If you just look in the record books, he had 4 years, got to 3 finals, won a Challenge Cup and had league finishes of 4th twice and 3rd twice. In terms of league position that's the only time apart from 2010-13 under TS that we've been top 4 for four consecutive seasons. We were garbage the year before he took over (TS last season) and we were even worse the year after he left (Powell's first). So on paper he was pretty good in the history of Wire coaches.


But that doesn't tell you the full story. It's like when you see that table of most successful England football coaches by win percentage and Fabio Capello is top. 


Price had four years but only really about one and a half where the fans were feeling good. That first year as Wires71 says was good progress given where we were the year before. Price brought better organisation and a defensive toughness. The black mark against that season was the Wembley final against Catalans when we took 20 minutes to get off the bus and the game was gone. 


Then in Price's second year we won 11 of our first 14 SL games then 5 of the last 15. That halfway point of the second year was the turning point in the whole Price era. Our Challenge Cup win came in that second half, and the win in the final against Saints was IMO the greatest 'big game' performance I've ever seen from Wire, given the occasion, the opposition, the pressure we withstood. Absolutely incredible. But a week or two after that win there were already people on here saying the Challenge Cup had 'papered over the cracks' and Price had taken us as far as he could. You could see we were in a spiral that we couldn't get out of. Blake Austin had started that season like a house on fire and was front runner for Man of Steel at the half way point then teams worked him out and that massively neutered our attack. 


The third and fourth year were a bit weird because of covid, we had a decent winning run when games restarted after the first lockdown and were played in front of empty stadiums but we never looked like we were in the calibre of Saints or Wigan or Catalans and we went down easily in the first round of the playoffs. That happened to us three times in a row and by the end we had low expectations of doing anything in the playoffs. 


The rugby wasn't very exciting under Price either but the most frustrating thing was that after half way through his second year we never looked like we had anything new. We knew when we came up against somebody good we'd fall short. We knew if we went behind in a game we wouldn't come back. We had good enough players to win more games than we lost but there was no Plan B against a team who had worked us out. 


The Cullen era was far more enjoyable than the Price era despite the results on paper not being as good. We had a few games every year where Wilderspool or the HJ was rocking and we'd win playing exciting rugby against a top team. We never had any memorable moments under Price apart from that backs to the wall win at Wembley. 

In terms of the Price era it looked to me that the players performed in some games despite SP and not because of him. I can never really forgive him for allowing the signing of Luther Burrell. I appreciate he may not have instigated it but he could have prevented it. 


In terms of this year. We heard before the season started that Burgess mentioned a transition year. I don't know how true that was but I thought it it was true I was looking forward to seeing more of Green, Thomas, Whitehead or even Harthill as a look towards the future. Not too sure what Max Wood did wrong in his recent spell in the team unless he picked up an injury. it will be interesting to see how we cope without Williams. When you look at Wigan last year had about an 8 game spell with both French and Field missing they managed to keep picking up results. I mean might be wrong but just can't see that happening here. 
Burgess' demeanour had definitely changed. Looks like he is trying to turn into his mentor (Wayne Bennett). 


Defensively we have big lapses that just weren't there last year. We beat Saints with 11 men on the pitch last year. If that happened now most teams would stick 50 on us. I think we miss Nicholson more than we probably thought we would and Russell is no replacement. 
In attack we hear how Martin Gleeson is a genius but I am just not seeing it. Apart from the big shift play with Dufty on the end or individual brilliance from Williams I just don't see much variety in attack. Last year we had little plays through the middle with Walker, Williams and Dufty combining against tired middles but have seen very little of that. Against Hull last week their big blokes (Herman, Assiata, Ashworth) had done big minutes and was perfect for picking them off down the middle but we just didn't spot it. 
It looks like we are low on confidence and when that happens individuals try and win the game on their own.  But confidence players like Dufty go into their shell a bit. The way to regain the confidence is if your defence is solid. Last year our goal line defence was up their with the best in the league but now we only need to give away a penalty or drop a ball and handover possession and if a team has a set or two in our 20 I am not confident in keeping them out. 


So a bit like my school reports. If he applies himself he could get a job driving a van but lacks concentration and easily distracted.